![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
I'm just finishing up my vid for the Vividcon premiere show, and it's a movie vid, to a film that relies pretty heavily on its plot twists. It's not M. Night Shyamalan, but same sort of issues; part of the movie's concept is the mystery of what's going on.
I've already tested it out (accidentally, and thank goodness she didn't mind) on a friend who hasn't seen the film, and am fairly confident that I haven't given away all the plotpoints, but it's still spoileriffic, by nature.
So, for the vidshow, given that I won't have the option of a neat little summary on my webpage to warn the spoiler-averse to rent the movie first, would it be a kindness to have a pre-vid "Spoiler Warning! If you haven't seen the film and you don't like spoilers, now would be a good time to...er...close your eyes..." title? Or do you think it would distract from the vid itself or annoy viewers/VJ's?
I've already tested it out (accidentally, and thank goodness she didn't mind) on a friend who hasn't seen the film, and am fairly confident that I haven't given away all the plotpoints, but it's still spoileriffic, by nature.
So, for the vidshow, given that I won't have the option of a neat little summary on my webpage to warn the spoiler-averse to rent the movie first, would it be a kindness to have a pre-vid "Spoiler Warning! If you haven't seen the film and you don't like spoilers, now would be a good time to...er...close your eyes..." title? Or do you think it would distract from the vid itself or annoy viewers/VJ's?
no subject
Date: 2004-07-27 12:16 am (UTC)Will there be programs at Vividcon? There were at the vid show at the last Escapade (the only one I've been to.) They showed what vids we'd be seeing, title / song / fandom and vidder... if there's something similar at Vividcon, I think you could consider people amply warned.
Either that or-- is there a vividcon e-mail list, for people going to the con? E-mail the list and tell them all to watch the movie beforehand. ;)
no subject
Date: 2004-07-27 06:37 am (UTC)Which exists, but I don't really want to draw attention to myself on it in terms of my specific vid and whether people have seen the source - I'm half feeling like even poking about for advice here could be misinterpreted as trying to build up hype (for a vid that's definitely not hypeworthy stuff; I'm just a paranoid sort.)
no subject
Date: 2004-07-27 06:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-07-27 12:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-07-27 06:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-07-27 02:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-07-27 06:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-07-27 03:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-07-27 06:30 am (UTC)I'm a spoilerwhore and *don't* mind being spoiled, so it's sort of like cooking without tastebuds - I don't know how the non-spoiler-loving world thinks, so I'm possibly overcautious and making a big deal out of nothing.
no subject
Date: 2004-07-27 08:29 am (UTC)There is a program, usually, I don't know how detailed it is. You could ask
no subject
Date: 2004-07-27 08:34 am (UTC)Tzikeh sent me an email describing the programs, and they sound like more than I could possibly ask for, both the set my paranoia at ease, and as a viewer. *drools in anticipation*
no subject
Date: 2004-07-27 10:02 am (UTC)Last year Zen vidded Hard Core Logo to "Monster" - it was one of the more talked about vids in the premiere show *and* it contained the hugest, massivest spoiler it possibly could have.
I have not seen the movie and I was spoiled - do I care? Nah, not at all cause - dude - *that* was the choice she needed to make to make her vid the vid it needed to be. Also - I have had plenty of time to see this movie and yet I have not. I knew going into the vid that it was source I was not familiar with - so breathe easy. No one will grumble and if they do grumble then they need to chill and I will tell them so. :) Loudly.
::so excited::
no subject
Date: 2004-07-27 10:07 am (UTC)Like I told Tzikeh, I can't believe the con is only 2-ish weeks away. Nooo! I need more time to freak out!
no subject
Date: 2004-07-27 05:24 am (UTC)I also heard several people make appreciative noises for the spoiler warning. I myself thought it was a great idea. She made it funny and part of the vid by using her pirate-y typeface and phrasing the warning as, "Keep a weather eye open, for there be spoilers ahead. Savvy? -Captain Jack Sparrow."
no subject
Date: 2004-07-27 06:47 am (UTC)So it seems like for many it might be unneeded (and possibly make people think I'm paranoid, which I am) but at least a few might be grateful for it. Maybe I'll go for something as straightforward as possible - "Warning - contains spoilers for [movie]" and try to keep it as short as possible for people who don't care about the warning.
no subject
Date: 2004-07-27 06:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-07-27 07:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-07-27 06:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-07-27 07:21 am (UTC)I agree with you, for my own viewing habits (I also have philosophical confusion over people who want spoiler-protection for tv episodes where the entire season, possibly two, coughBetterBuffyFicscough, has already aired in its country of origin, though I have no problem complying with their wishes) - I've just gone paranoid due to the number of People Whose Brains Don't Work Like Mine that I've come across in fandom.
no subject
Date: 2004-07-27 07:32 am (UTC)Hee. No problem. And no need to be paranoid. If someone sees a vid begin, doesn't recognize the source, and decides to keep watching, that is *their look-out* if they are spoiled for something they haven't seen yet. Plus? It's a vid show. There is a 99% chance that there will be *something* each person in the audience has yet to see. That's just a given.
Except me - I get to see everything first. ;)
Runs away, screaming the "BURNINATING" song at the top of her lungs
no subject
Date: 2004-07-27 07:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-07-27 10:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-07-27 03:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-07-27 03:15 pm (UTC)scarily cutevery dedicated!no subject
Date: 2004-07-27 04:30 pm (UTC)cutededicated part is that she would have done it anyway, even if